Publication Ethics

All parties Involved in the publication or publication in the scientific bulletin of the University of Elbasan, "Alexander Xhuvani", The Journal's Editorial Board, Editors, Stuble Partners, and Authers Muststand and Ethics of Scientifications. The publication of articles in the scientific bulletin must be guided and implemented by police basic on the best scientific research procedures and practices. Scientific Papers for Publication Should Basically Preserve The Three Ethical Values ​​of Publication:

1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the Management of Publications;
2. Justice, which Grants Copyright to Copyright Holders; and
3. Honesty, which is free from Duplication, Fabrication, Forgery, and Wounded.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

Articles Go Through a Peer-Review Process is important for development a Coherent and Respectful Body of Knowledge. This is a form of reconstruction of the Quality of the Author's Articles and the institutions bend. Revisionwing articles is a form of application and embodiment of the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to aggregate on the expert standards of Ethical Behavior for All Parties Involved in Publishing Actions: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and Publishers. The Editorial Board, The Editors, Undersand Their Duts as Responsible in Evel process, Both and in Other Responsibilities.

Duties and Responsibility of the Editorial Team

Fairness: Regardless of the Author's Color, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religious Views, Ethnic Background, Nationality, OR POLITICAL POSITION, The Editors' Evaluation of the Manuscript Bead Basely on the Intellectual Contents of the Articles Articles.

Confidentiality: the editor and any editorial staff are not permitted to disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, Revoice, Prospective Revivewer, Co-Editor, and Publisher.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Unpublished Information Disclosed in the Submitted Text May Not Be Used in the Editor's Own Research with the Express Authorization of the Author.

Decision to publish: the editors are respectible for deciding which articles should be published from the articles that have been submitted. Articles' Validity and Benefits to Researchers and Readers Should Be Used As A Determining Factor in Any Decision. Editors will Base their police on the Journal's Editorial Board and Generally Applicable Legal Rules As Defamation, Copyright Infringement, and Wounded. May Editors Negotiate with Other Editors or Other Reviewers before Making these Decisions.

Manuscript evaluation: each manuscript must be checked for originality by the editor before Being Accept. Editors must organize and usewers' reviews Fairly and Intelligently. The Editor Should Explain the Peer Review Process to the Author. For manuscripts consider for publication, the editors should use users, selecting individuals with the necessary experience and evaluating say anonymously.

Reviewer Duties and Responsibility

CONTRRITBUTIONS TO EDITORIAL DECISIONS: Reviewers Help Editors in Making Editorial Decisions and ALSO HELP AUTHORS THRAGH RECOMMANTIATIONS TO IMLITY OF ARTICLE.

Punctuality: Once assigned, a reviewer who Feels that he lacks the skills required to evaluate a article or who anticipates that his evaluation not be compiled on time must and with the article of the process.

Objectivity Standard: The Review Must Be Conducted in an Impartial Manner. It is utithical to criticize the author Personally. Revisions Should Be Concise and Well-ReaSon, unless the editor specifically instructor otherwise.

Confidentiality: Any Article Sent to the Reviewer for Consideration Should Be Treated As a Confidential Document. Without the Editor's Permission, Manuscripts May Not Be Displayed or Discussed with Others.

Knowledge of Reference Sources: The Citation Must Indicate relevant publications that the author has not cied. The Reviewer Should Also Inform the Editor IF The Article Under Review and Any Previously Published Work of which they have had any significant overlap or simillary.

Confidentiality and conflict of interest: any ideas or information obtained through peer revix are required to be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

Duties and Responsibility of the Author

Writing Standard: Authors Should Present ACCUrates Reports of the Research Conducted as Well As the Objectives and Benefits of the Research. Basic Data Shouldaccurately Represented in the Item Shipped. The Manuscript Should Contain Sufficient Detail and References to Allow Others to Replicate or Continue the Research. The Act of Fraud or Deliberate Inaccuracy in the Submission of Data and References is Unethical and Unacceptable Behavior.

Originalyity and plagiarism: Authors must enure that they work is completely original, and if they have used someone Else's words or work, they must enure it is correctly cited.

Submission of an article to more than one Journal: The Same Research Cannot Be Published by the Same Author in More Than One Journal (Multiple or Simultaneous Publication). It is uthical and inappropriate for authors to simultaneously submit the Same Paper to Several Journals.

Acknowledgment of the Source: The Author Must Always Acknowled The Contributions of Other Authors. Writers Should Cite Works that have haad an impact on the way their Scholarly Work is Written.

Author Citation: Only Those Who Have Major A Major Contribution to the Conception, Design, Implementation, or Interpretation of the Presented Research Should Be Ciked As Autores. Co-Authors Should Be Named As Those Who Have Significantly ContributtedConception, Design, Implementation, or Interpretation of the Presented Research Should Be Ciped As Autores. Co-Authors Should Be Named As Those Who Have Significantly Contributed. Those individuals who controlled to a substantive element of the study EFFORT Should be acknowledged or ciped as controls. They Should Also Ennsure That All Co-Authors have reviewed the final version of the article and approved it before submitting it for publication.

Basic ERRORS IN PUBLISHED WORKS: COME AUTHOR FINDS SIGNIFICANT ERRORS OR INACCURECIES IN SELF-PUBLISHED WORKS, IT IS THE AUTHOR'S DUTY TO EMEDIATEly Notify the editor or public and cooperate with the editor or correct. It is the Author's Responsibility to Report Any ERRORS or inaccuracies in Self-Published WORKS TO THE REVIEW OR PUBLISHER AND TO WORK WITH THE RETTER or CORRECT.