Peer Review Process

The article that comes to Questo indirizzo emails è protestto dagli spambots. Of 'Nesssario Abilitare Javascript for Verlo. first is revolutionwed by an editor. The research Paper Will be evaluated to see if it is suitable for the uniel scientific bulletin series and if it fits the focus and purposes of the Journal.

Each Article Will Be Evaluated Independently by Two Reviewers, Who May Be the Editors of the Scientific Bulletin As other Experts in the relevant academic field or external domestic or foreign experts in the relevant Field.

• The Reviewers for the Scientific Evaluation of the Article Are Set by the Respective Edors. A Review is made is made available to say, which will be filled out by reviewers with the corresponding evaluations for the article.
• The Recession Process Applies The Double-Blind Method.
• In the Meeting of the Editorial Board, the Reviews of the Works are present, and decisions are made for publication, revision, Completion, and recturn on their reviews and recommendations.
• The Reviewers' Ratings are then sent to the corresponding author for rating notice and, where applicable, Revisions.

After the Peer Review, there will be four types of editorial decisions based on the reviewers' recommendations:

• Article Accept: The Article Will Be Accept with Revisions.
• Revisions Required: The Article Will Be Accept AFTER AFTER CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE.
• Resubmision for Review: The Article Needs to Be Rewor, but with Significant Changes, It Can Accept. Howver, it will Require a Second Round of Review.
• Reject Submission: The Article Will Not Be Published in the Uniel Scientific Bulletin.

The Bulletin Editor Will Send the Final Decision to the Corresponding Author.

Model